Is “The Adventure of the Cardboard Box” Literature?

The first piece of “literature” that I can recall reading in school was Dr. Suess’s The Lorax. I remember the Once’ler coming and cutting down all of the Truffula trees to make his “Thneeds” that everyone needed oh so very much. In the end, the reader is left with the clear message of taking care of the earth if we want it to be around for years to come. Ever since then, I have always assumed the rest of the literature I would read for school would be similar to The Lorax. There is a beginning, middle and end with characters who have a conflict but end up teaching the reader a lesson in the end. That was until, however, I read Doyle’s short story The Adventure of the Cardboard Box.

Let something be clear though. I do not intend for the reader of this blog to believe Doyle’s story was written poorly or lacked the qualities of good writing, because it certainly did not. There were descriptive literary devices used throughout as well as complex vocal that I admit I had to google every once in a while. The story satisfied the characteristics I have known needed for a story to be classified at literature except for the reader being left to learn a lesson. At the end of the The Adventure of the Cardboard Box, I found myself surprisingly satisfied with the interesting tale of Holmes but found that I was lacking that life lesson that usually comes from literature. I never really considered questioning the stories academic relevance until I was asked to write this blog post and consider if it really is literature.

I think this speaks volumes of what we as students have been programmed to recognize literature as. We assume that stories only reach that level if they fulfill certain requirements. But isn’t is sad that just because we enjoy a story be believe it cannot have any literary value? Just because I didn’t count the pages until the story was over or need to take a break in order to let my mind rest and get away from the book doesn’t mean what I read doesn’t have any value. I think it is important for educators and those getting educated to remember that literature should be enjoyed and it that is all that you get out of it, then that is okay. That does not make it any less valuable in the literary community. It might even make it more valuable.

One thought on “Is “The Adventure of the Cardboard Box” Literature?

  1. Similarly to you, I didn’t consider whether or not “The Adventure of the Cardboard Box” is literature or not until I started writing my blog post. Also, I agree that not all literature must conform to the preconceived notions that we have for such scholarly writing. The short story is no less an example of good writing than anything else. Instead, it just has a different style.
    If you wanted to lengthen your post for a revision, perhaps you could include some examples of the literary devices or complex vocabulary that helped you realize that the short story is literature. Overall, you argued your point well!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s